Terrorism as extreme form of war and a distrust of „Another”

The article considers war as a concept that is constructed by the style of philosophical thinking, which is typical for a particular historical epoch. The style of thinking sets the frameworks, boundaries and laws of its understanding. The article compares the classical model of a war, the concept of which was set by the mind of the Enlightenment, and the modern forms of its implementation, when the philosophical mind undergoes deconstruction processes. Strict logic and legislative "pure reason" (Immanuel Kant) determined the relevant content, form and description of the language of war. The war was carried out according to laws of logic and rules, which assumed transparent and efficient steps. It could be read by Another (opponent). Thus, paradoxically, trust in the Other was revealed. For example, the rules of honor and duty were preserved, a declaration of war was required, the troops were lined up in a certain order, and there was very strict hierarchy of officers. However, modern deconstructivist processes and the deconstruction of metaphysics destroy the classical unity of the logic of war and admit the rhizome of its forms. Therefore, modern reality knows the multiplicity of forms of war: information war, marketing war, virtual war, terrorist war and etc. There are no rules, no logic, no trust in such war. The absence of these factors characterizes, for example, terrorism, which is now considered as a new form of war. Terrorism is a manifestation of total distrust, hatred and contempt for Another